Comparison
Trending Loot Deals vs Proxy MTProto▕ پروکسی ایرانی
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @loot_dealsx | @mtpproxyirani |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.5M | 2.7M |
| Avg views | 120,410 | 79,095 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 2.9% |
| 30-day growth | +33.4% | +1.8% |
| Language | Bahasa Indonesia | فارسی |
| Category | gambling | — |
| Channel age | — | 1359 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@loot_dealsx
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@mtpproxyirani
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.